Skip to main content

40 Questions on the Historical Jesus








40 Questions on the Historical Jesus by Marvin Pate

Marvin Pate, Professor of Christian Theology at Ouachita Baptist University, seeks to get at the heart of the study of the historical Jesus in recent times.  The format of the book follows the most pertinent questions regarding the historical Jesus from what’s at stake with the four gospels, the Old Testament and the Messiah, and the historical reliability of the gospel accounts.  While study of the historical Jesus continues, Dr. Pate handles the most significant questions for the church and the academy concerning this avenue of study.  What comes out of the book is a well-reasoned, fully researched, and thorough investigation of not only the historical Jesus but those who have written on this subject over the years. 

While many today have heard of the Jesus Seminar and their work, few have really dived into how and why they came up with their results.  After finding only 18% of Jesus’ sayings and acts deemed authentic, we are left to wonder how they came to these assumptions (57)?  Pate notes that they used two criteria mainly, the criteria of dissimilarity and the criteria of multiple attestation.  In a word, the criteria of dissimilarity “states that a saying or deed of Jesus that stands out both from his Jewish heritage and from his later followers (the church) truly goes back to Jesus (57).”  The criteria of multiple attestation states that, “If a saying or deed attributed to Jesus occurs in two or more of these sources, it is thought to be authentic. If it occurs in only one source, it is not thought to be attested to and therefore is not considered authentic (57).”  The result is that (58),

“…Jesus, he ends up with no connection to his Jewish heritage and no ties to the church he founded. In other words, the Jesus Seminar portrays Jesus as a “talking head” with no body. So this “talking head” Jesus appears to be is nothing more than a Greek style philosopher who utters mere moral maxims about how to treat each other, but who makes no claim to be the Messiah, announces no kingdom of God, makes no proclamation against sin, and subverts no religious establishment.”

The surprising element in all of this work by the Jesus Seminar is that Jesus ends up looking a lot like a modern day religious wisdom teller, not someone who was crucified on a Cross.
In Question 20, Pate takes up the question regarding why we have four gospel accounts, not one, or not many more.  After surveying the ground of the traditional view that the NT provides reliable record of the four eyewitnesses and their various perspectives, Pate brings to the foreground the liberal attempt to dismantle authority and continuity.  Pate draws on the work of Ben Witherington III who argues that the form of gospels that liberal scholars promote are full of Gnostic thought, but this thought didn’t come about until at least the 2nd century and there is no evidence that any Christian church recognized Gnostic texts as authoritative (205).  Further, the multiple Gospel accounts give different perspective that fill out the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, thus giving readers a fully orbed view.

This is an excellent book on the historical Jesus that presents the material in a compelling manner, clear with arguments from the best sources.


Thanks to Kregel Academic for the copy of this book in exchange for an honest review.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Saving Casper

Saving Casper: A Christian and an Atheist Talk about Why We Need to Change the Conversion Conversation by Jim Henderson and Matt Casper http://www.amazon.com/Saving-Casper-Christian-Conversion-Conversation/dp/1414364881 Many readers will quickly know the authors of this book from their previous release Jim and Casper Go to Church.  Jim and Matt’s new book entitled Saving Casper focuses on the way we talk about conversion in the church and the devastating ways we have pushed away atheists and other non-believers by our posture.  Both Jim and Matt traversed the national landscape, meeting in churches and asking hard questions about faith, conversion, and life. The basic premise of the book and travel is laid out here in their words, “Part of what Casper and I are trying to achieve when we speak to a group of Christians is to help people move a little bit on their “judgment meter.”  This capacity, while intellectually and often theologically uncomfortable,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Essential Christian Doctrine

  Essential Christian Doctrine , General Editor John MacArthur Pastor John MacArthur has for years been teaching the Word of God in both pulpit ministry, books, and conferences with an aim to displaying God’s revelation to his listeners in a winsome and foundational manner.  This new book, Essential Christian Doctrine takes an entire life of teaching and preaching and encapsulates the main contours of the Christian faith for its readers.  John in a systematic way highlights the most necessary teachings from Scripture including God’s Word, the Trinity, while also including sections on Man and the Future. One of the most helpful ways the authors bring to light biblical truth and theology is the way in which they group together particular themes.  In the section on the Holy Spirit, instead of a complex discussion of personhood, word pictures of the Holy Spirit are introduced in a discernible and profitable manner.  The metaphors for the Holy Spirit include fir...
Post a Comment
Read more

God's Grace for All of Life

The Romance of Grace by Jim McNeely III To be honest, when I received this book in the mail I had visions of what it might be like with a title like, ‘The Romance of Grace.’  The emotional rollercoaster and one-sided perspective on how our emotions fuel our faith was my presumption about the book, but this was the furthest thing from the truth as I started reading.  The Romance of Grace by Pastor Jim McNeely III is a careful look at the movements of grace in the way God pursues us with his love and his desire to get us to love him back.  McNeely writes, “We are entering a cosmic romance with a passionate lover, and He is interested in our heart’s truest desire.  His deepest objective isn’t to make us more moral; it is to get us to love Him back.  Virtue is the fruit, not the root” (18).  Why is this helpful?  For one thing, beginning with God’s initiating grace frees us from starting out on the wrong foot in the way we tell the story and...
2 comments
Read more