Apostate: The Men who Destroyed the Christian West by Kevin
Swanson
Kevin Swanson, Pastor of Castle Rock OPC in Castle Rock,
Colorado has written a disturbing and controversial book about men he believes
helped destroy the Christian West.
Swanson looks at philosophers, churchmen, writers, and thinkers in his
book (men from Aquinas to Steinbeck) who at some point were externally
connected to the Christian past but who self-consciously rejected it for a
materialist or anti-Christian worldview.
Swanson examines these ‘nephilim’ from a literary, cultural and
philosophical framework and hopes to trace the destructive framework these men
had upon society (18). There are many
things in the book that ring true from Marx, Nietzsche, Darwin, and Dewey that
are elements of thought that are inimical and antithetical to the Christian faith. Yet, as a whole this book was an utter
failure and disappointment both in its method, message, and approach.
Swanson begins with a foray into the degradation of Western
society through its acceptance of homosexuality, witchcraft, and other immoral actions. He mentions Harry Potter being ‘immersed in
witchcraft and being trained by a homosexual,’ and at the end of the paragraph
says that this trend is an example of a ‘macro-shift away from the Christian
faith’ (14). This is a factual
inaccuracy to say the least. Harry
Potter is not being trained in witchcraft in the Rowling books but in sorcery
and magic. Secondly, his training is not
designed to advance evil ends but to defeat dark arts, including those promoted
by Voldemort. Rather than advancing evil
activities, Harry continually sacrifices his self not only for his friends but
for those whom he loves. Tolkien and
Lewis were both roundly condemned for their use of magic in their books as
well. Yet, loud and vociferous
condemnation does not mean that magic was used for immoral and evil ends in
Tolkien, Lewis or Rowling. A closer
reading of the Harry Potter books would reveal that the magic is used in
Harry’s life and the purpose of the books as a whole.
Swanson constantly throughout the book quotes from Wikipedia
and sources like Fox news. In their own
rights, these sites are not the best information for good research on people
like Descartes, Marx, and other writers he cites. Learning how to cite quality academic sources
and engage with their argument is something you learn very early on in education
and I think Swanson has missed the boat here.
Furthermore, Swanson makes the point in his chapter on Shakespeare that
there are 2,000 biblical references in Shakespeare’s plays but he says, “this
is to be expected of any 16th century playwright” (206). Rather than examine how Shakespeare
references the Bible in his plays, Swanson is quick to point out that
Shakespeare’s metaphysic is a fatal oversight (211). He fails to see that Shakespeare has a very
robust biblical idea of sin and the way evil deeds are self-destructive. From Macbeth we see:
But let the frame of things disjoint, both the worlds
suffer,
Ere we will eat our
meal in fear and sleep
In the affliction of
these terrible dreams
That shake us
nightly. Better be with the dead,
Than on the torture
of the mind to lie
In restless
ecstasy. (act 3, scene 2)
I think Swanson’s major inaccuracies in the book are due to
a wrongheaded understanding of how to read literature. He constantly refers to the life of an author
and their dark deeds and then purports that meaning upon their work and then
draws connections to the destruction of the Christian west. He makes the
comment that, “It is abundantly clear that Hemingway has no confidence in the
resurrection” (259). I don’t believe
either that Hemingway had a belief in the resurrection but how does one
understand this from the Old Man and the Sea?
Swanson is at times trying to read literature written by Hemingway,
Steinbeck and others like a systematic theology textbook, finding only what
doesn’t match up his theological rationale rather than seeing how their work at
times mirrors a biblical worldview even if the author fails to believe in God. Lastly,
Swanson’s idea of apostasy does not seem to hold because many of these
philosophers and writers were not really believers from the beginning, rather
they just grew up around a family who were believers.
I agree with Swanson’s assessment that the West has been
radically affected by some alien and unbiblical philosophies. Could this be the reason for the destruction
of the Christian West? This could be a possible
explanation but cannot be the entirety of the reason for the decline of the
Christian West.
Thanks to Cross Focused Reviews and Generations with Vision
for the copy of this book in exchange for review.
Comments
Post a Comment