A Commentary on Judges
and Ruth by Robert Chisholm Jr.
This new commentary on Judges and Ruth by Professor Robert
Chisholm Jr. is a real treasure. Not
only is it painstakingly detailed in its analysis of the Hebrew grammar and
syntax of these books, but it gives the reader numerous ideas on how you could
preach these books faithfully. With over
80 pages of Introduction to the Book of Judges and over 30 pages to introduce
Ruth, Dr. Chisholm covers much ground from the outline of the book to the
theology of the author. I have not quite
found a commentary that this kind on the market that is so attune to the
details of the text while also giving the reader some pointers for the
application of the text in preaching.
Chisholm uses exegetical rigor and pastoral sensitivity nicely in this book
and speaks clearly at most points. Being
away from seminary for several years, this commentary pushed me back to my days
studying Hebrew, looking at the forms of Hebrew verbs and how they are used in
context.
Highlights
Chisholm is careful to draw out the significance of women in
the book of Judges in his introduction to the book. His writing is balanced though, as he writes,
“Fortunately two courageous women rose to the occasion and compensated for
Barak’s weakness. However, the necessity
of women playing a militaristic role, rather than inspiring the hero, was
symptomatic of a decline in the quality of male leadership.” (72) Demanding Deborah’s help in battle, Barak
early on rallied the support of women among the people. Yet, it was not without consequence that
rallying women for battle ready service denigrated one’s manly service in the
army. In the story of Samson, Delilah
lures him into her gaze and this leads to his demise (76). Samson ends up grinding grain, the kind of
job a female would typically do. There
is a direct correlation in the moral decline of Israel and the place that women
have in this fall. Early on there were
heroic actions done by women, but later on in the book of Judges we see the
surrounding nations deceiving Israel by the hand of different women.
In the same vein, Chisholm picks up on an interesting part
of Judges 14 in relation to Samon picking a wife. Chisholm writes, “To exonerate Samson’s
parents and the Lord, it is tempting to view the Lord’s involvement as
passive. According to this scenario God simply
allowed Samson to follow his selfish, wrong inclinations and then incorporated
them into his overall plan, much like he did the sinful deeds of Joseph’s
brothers. However, the inclusion of the
phrase “from the Lord” (literal translation) suggest that the Lord was the
driving force behind Samson’s behavior” (403).
God nudged Samson and proceeded with full knowledge over the
situation. This rubs against our view of
God at times who allow people to run their course in sin, but brings us back
into a view that says that God truly is sovereign over all things.
In the book of Ruth, we find an emphasis on names. Naomi literally means “be lovely, pleasant,”
but Naomi didn’t think this was appropriate.
Chisholm mentions that she “wanted a new name, (mara), meaning “bitter,”
because she was convinced that God had brought bitterness into her life. The verb used here reflects her deep
emotional pain…the word also in Zecharaiah 12:10, where it describes the bitter
grief one feels over the loss of an only child.” (610) We feel the weight of such bitterness in the
heart of Naomi here and how the biblical record in other places, Zechariah and
Job seem to flesh this kind of bitterness out.
Chisholm rightly brings us into the place where Naomi is sitting and
allows to glimpse into the way one would feel who is overcome with bitterness.
Overall, this book was very good on the grammar of both Ruth
and Judges, the theology and application of the book, and the way one might
preach these books well.
Thanks to Kregel Academic for the copy of this book in
exchange for an honest review.
Comments
Post a Comment