Skip to main content

The Crusades

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

The Crusades are often considered as a "black stain in the history of the Catholic Church," all about "power and popes," and remain our "memory of a long European onslaught."  Yet, there are many misconceptions regarding this time in history.  The prevailing thesis, at least given by Edward Gibbons is that the Crusades were primarily due to the concept of "surplus sons"  These surplus sons were "members of noble families who would not inherit and whom the heirs found it increasingly difficult to provide with even modest incomes" (Rodney Stark, The Triumph of Christianity, 215).  Rather than promote this theory, Stark gives us the truth that Crusades were possible only because this period was one of great economic growth, putting more resources in the hands of the ruling elite in Western Europe (221).  Further, it wasn't the surplus sons who went but the heads of upper-class households who had the wealth to raise money for the knights and infantry (kings, princes, counts, dukes, barons, and earls).  The enormous expense of the Crusades caused some of the upper-class heads to sell off land, some going into bankruptcy to go crusading.

In terms of our view of history, including the Crusaders and the Muslims involved in the fighting, we often forget how brutal and intolerant the Muslims were.  Muslim forces began taking over Christian provinces soon after Muhammad's death, in 635-640 many areas were seized by Muslim forces, including Syria.  Stark writes, "Thus, by the time of the First Crusade, Christendom had been fighting a defensive war with Islam for more than 450 years! (217).  In the 11th century, Seljuk Turks converting to Islam found it their job to harass, sell into slavery, and torture those Christian travelers on their way to Jerusalem along the Anatolian villages.  We have this speech by Pope Urban II upon his gathering the crusaders together,

"Many of God's churches have been violated...they have ruined the altars with filth defilement.  They have circumcised Christians and smeared the blood on the altars or poured it into baptismal fonts.It amused them to kill Christians by opening up their bellies and drawing out the end of their intestines...What shall I say about the abominable rape of women?"

One of the cruelest and devastating losses by the hands of Muslim forces was the taking of Antioch after the 1266.  The Sultan of Egypt, Baybars (also Baibars).  Baybars ordered all inhabitants, including all women and children, killed or enslaved, is estimated that 17,000 men were murdered and tens of thousands of women and children were marches away as slaves (231).  This picture gives us a more balanced perspective, rather than pointing only to the Crusaders as barbaric and bigoted and the Saracens as praiseworthy and chivalrous.

Why did the knights of Europe involve themselves in the Crusades?
For one, there was a perceived need for penance and the other reason was to liberate the Holy Land (222).  It was not the case that the Crusaders were only defensive, rather "A major reason pilgrimages were so common was because the knights of Europe were both very violent and very religious (222)." One of the most notorious pilgrims was Fulk III (972-1040) who made 4 pilgrimages to the Holy Land, due in large part because Fulk was a plunderer, murderer, robber, and a swearer of false oath," even having his wife burned to death in her wedding dress (223).

The unworthiness that a knight would have felt would've been enough to push him to make a pilgrimage to the Holy Land.  Further, the pope himself assured crusaders that a pilgrimage would wash away their sins, and at the same time they could rescue the Holy Land against sacrilege and invaders.

For more reading beyond Stark's book called The Triumph of Christianity, the fine work of Thomas F. Madden (Professor of History at St. Louis University) is worth reading.  His books are numerous but here are a few worth mentioning:
The Concise History of the Crusades
The Crusades: The Essential Readings

And, the work of Jonathan Riley-Smith is also worth reading:
The Crusades: A History
The First Crusaders: 1095-1131


Popular posts from this blog

the great spiritual migration

The Great Spiritual Migration by Brian D McLaren

Brian McLaren and his own pithy way brings to the foreground and emphasis on a new kind of Christianity. The kind of faith that Brian envisions is a kind of migration not been set in the bedrock of beliefs that is unmoving but rather shifting with both culture and with faith. His new book the great spiritual migration is exactly that, a pointed work that encapsulates a vision towards the future where Christianity is changing and its peoples lives are changed as well.

Brian states in the introduction, "but we also know that for a lot of people Christianity is malfunctioning, seriously so, and it's not pretty. This kind of frustration with conventional Christianity is what McLaren gets gets to at the heart of this message is concerned with a number of different clusters unbelief. One, namely that Christianity has been stuck in a set of propositions or beliefs that has controlled churches in the faith, rather then a spirit of love t…

Black Earth: The Holocaust as History and Warning

Black Earth: The Holocaust as History and Warning by Timothy Snyder
Misperceptions, misconnections, and missed observations are just some of the issues that Timothy Snyder raises in his book, Black Earth, concerning the Holocaust.  Snyder, no stranger to the frontlines of scholarship on the Holocaust, with his previous book Bloodlands, that concerns the land from Hitler to Stalin, takes a look at the Holocaust from new sources and new avenues of thought.  How did some nation-states survive relatively unscathed from Nazi persecution while others, notably Jewish populations, succumb to a wave of killings?  Also, what was the role of the Soviet Union in the war and how did Stalin effect changes in the Final Solution?  These questions are only two of the many that Snyder answers in his detailed account of the Holocaust.
One of the best chapters was entitled The Auschwitz Paradox.  Generally when the public thinks about the Holocaust, we think of Auschwitz first or at the top of our mental m…

The Paraclete Poetry Anthology, Edited by Mark S. Burrows

Bringing words to life on a page is hard work, and no work is harder than poetry.  Poets take the visceral, the mundane, and the disjointed and frayed things of life and put them on their head.  This new anthology of poetry put out by Paraclete Press and edited by Mark S. Burrows, takes the best poetry of today and brings together old and new poems from these gifted creators.  You find poems from Scott Cairs, SAID, Phyllis Tickle, and others.  The collection stems the span of 2005-2016 and includes both religious poems and themes, as well as themes covering a broad swath of topics.

One of the beauties of this collection is the array of poems that the anthology includes in its pages.  One poem in particular stuck with me as read through the collection.  Anna Kamienska is a wonderful Polish poet who interacts with the wider lens of faith while looking carefully at the world we live in.  She says in her poem named Gratitude, (44)

A tempest threw a rainbow in my face
so that I wanted to…