Skip to main content

Doing the Right Thing: Making Moral Choices in a World Full of Options by Scott B. Rae

Doing the Right Thing by Scott B. Rae
http://www.amazon.com/Doing-Right-Thing-Choices-Options/dp/0310513995/ref=tmm_pap_title_0









Doing the Right Thing: Making Moral Choices in a World Full of Options by Scott B. Rae
Based upon the film series by Chuch Colson, Doing the Right Thing by Professor of Christian Ethics Scott B. Rae of Biola University, is a rush of fresh air through the issues of medicine, marketplace, and public life.  The book is short and succinct but chalk full of insightful wisdom on the major issues that we face today.  Rather than virulently stay away from the tough questions that cultural critics ask about Christianity, Scott answers these objections head on with honesty and transparency.  Lifting up the truth of God’s Word, sound logical principles, and a desire to see human flourishing as part of the goal of life, Scott is well equipped to give us very good answers to our questions, from outside and within the walls of the church. 

In the first chapter Scott draws out the ethical mess we find ourselves in by relating the simultaneous views of considering some things are absolutely wrong while wanting to hold that morality is relative.  Murder, incest, rape are absolutely wrong but don’t mention abortion or gay rights, these are off the table in the realm of right and wrong.  Feelings and opinions are the moral arbiter of truth rather than some fixed standard of morals. (25-26)  In contrast to the prevailing notion that morals are incidental and only personal feelings of the individual, Scott puts forth a view that for a Christian worldview ethics are both universal and knowable (34-35).  At all times and in all places, Christian ethics are right independent of cultural norms, values, and tastes.  Furthermore, Christian ethics are knowable by virtue of God’s Word and being his image bearers.  God has revealed his will for ethical, moral, and personal living, not just one area of life.  Even through the fall of man has bent humanity in the direction of sin and evil, man retains the vestiges of the image of God in his understanding of justice, rationality, and right and wrong.  By creation and revelation, God has not left man in a state of confusion regarding his vision for ethical living.

Scott asks great questions in this book.  One of those questions is, “Can objective morality be adequately grounded apart from God existing?” (57)  I applaud Scott’s sincere honesty in saying that people can live a moral life without respect for God.  Yet, this begs the question about objective morality.  Without reference to a Divine lawgiver, how do we speak objectively about morality, right and wrong?    Scott is right to propose that in a naturalistic worldview, objective morality is impossible to debate because there is no foundational binding position on issues, just preferences and opinions.  I would also add here that the question can be reframed in terms of trust; without reference to God as providing moral objective foundations, whose voice are we going to trust when looking to make ethical decisions and why?  In some parts of the world, morality is guided by the loudest or most violent voice through coercion and manipulation.  But, for the Christian believer, ethics are founded upon the objective Word of God, his revelation of himself, and the image of God that we have been created with.

I find myself applauding Scott’s work here in the numerous examples he provides.  In one case, he makes the point that, “what constitutes a human person is not fundamentally a scientific question but a philosophical one.” (104)  Science can tell us what constitutes a human being by discussing how the body works, but it cannot tell us fundamentally what a person is morally.  The scientist in the debate with Scott conceded this point to Scott’s credit, yet he also maintained that if science can’t answer it, then it’s all an opinion of an individual.  The scientist is trapped in his own worldview that outside of scientific explanations no solid answer is to be found.

I really enjoyed this book.  With plenty of real life examples and solid logic, Scott gets us to think how a Christian ethical viewpoint radically shapes how we view the world, and in turn how we act in the world.


Thanks to Zondervan and Book Look Bloggers for the copy of this book in exchange for an honest review.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Favorite Color is Blue. Sometimes.: A Journey Through Loss with Art and Color

My Favorite Color is Blue. Sometimes by Roger Hutchison

Taking a look at the digital copy of this book allowed me to look at the striking art inside the book, and its connection to the words of the page that were focusing on loss.  Looking at the physical copy of the book even brings to life more the staggering similarity that the words and pain have together on the page.  The focus here is how certain colors express the sentiments of those who have lost a loved one.  I did not think that I would relate too well to this book until two days ago, as we lost our little boy, who was only 17 weeks old.  The pain is palpable and yet the pages of this book give me good reason to think of my son with a sense of pride and hope.

Roger writes, "You are a shooting star. Your light trails across the heavens.  I blinked and you were gone."  We were full of anticipation at the first and second ultrasounds, and there was the picture of our little boy Jackson, his developing face and little …

The Catholic Novelist in the Protestant South

Mystery and Manners: Occasional Prose by Flannery O’Connor
A profound simplicity of thought, a penetrating vision of what it means to be human, Flannery O’Connor embodies the spirit of bringing fictional stories to life.  Others might call her fiction ‘grotesque’ in a rather unflattering manner, but O’Connor was not content to live up to their criticisms.  In this short book of collected essay and lectures, Mystery and Manners, editors and friends of Flannery, Robert and Sally Fitzgerald have given us a glimpse into the vision of her faith, style and life as a writer.   A lifelong Catholic, Flannery O’Connor sought to wed together the moral integrity of her faith with the character of her craft in writing.  Specifically, fiction for her was an exploration in imitation.
In a rather illuminating statement in the chapter entitled, “A Catholic Novelist in the Protestant South, “ O’Connor writes,
“I am specifically concerned with fiction because that is what I write.  There is a certain em…