Skip to main content

Theological Authority and the Role of Tradition







Theological Authority and the Role of Tradition

How do we understand Scriptural authority in light of the received Catholic creeds and ecumenical councils, confessions, and particular opinions of theologians?  The Scriptures are of primary importance for the believer and rest of the lot, including creeds, councils, and confessions are subsumed under this head, but how does all this work?  Oliver Crisp, in his book God Incarnation: Explorations in Christology (17), brings to the foreground these issues as he writes,
1.   
“Scripture is the norma normans, the principium theologiae.  It is the final arbiter of matters theological for Christians as the particular place in which God reveals himself to his people.  This is the first-order authority in all matters of Christian doctrine.

2. Catholic creeds, as defined by an ecumenical council of the Church, constitute a first-tier norma normata, which have second-order authority in matters touching Christian doctrine.  Such norms derive their authority from Scripture to which they bear witness.
3.    
Confessional and conciliar statements of particular ecclesial bodies are a second tier of norma normata, which have third-order authority in matters touching Christian doctrine.  They also derive their authority from Scripture to the extent that they faithfully reflect the teaching of Scripture.
4.    
The particular doctrines espoused by theologians including those individuals accorded the title Doctor of the Church which are not reiterations of matters that are de fide, or entailed by something de fide, constitute theologoumena, or theological opinions, which are not binding upon the Church, but which may be offered up for legitimate discussion within the Church.”

First, Scripture is the primary resting place for all matters of theological import for the believer, yet this does not mean that Scripture is alone, for it is “always read within the context of a given ecclesial community, which is, as it were, surrounded by a great cloud of theological witnesses and informed by the Christian tradition (17-18).”

Second, Catholic creeds (Nicene, Apostles’, Chalcedonian, and Athanasian Creeds) derive their authority from the Scriptures but speak as authoritative as they reflect the Scriptures.  On some occasions, the creeds are distillations of biblical teaching on what a person is to believe in order to be a Christian and the basic tenets of the faith, but do not encapsulate a robust teaching on fullness of Christian doctrine.  Ex. We learn in the Apostles’ Creed that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit and that the Christian reciting the Creed is to believe in the Holy Spirit, but we are not left with anything else concerning the Spirit.  Therefore, the Creed points us back to the Scriptures to learn more about the Spirit, his work, and our role in the work of the Spirit.

Third, confessional and conciliar statements are of use to their particular denominations and serve as a third-order authority as they faithfully reflect the teaching of Scripture and of the creeds.  One thinks of such confessions as the Westminster Confession of Faith, the Three Forms of Unity (Belgic Confession, Canons of Dort, and Heidelberg Catechism), but also documents like the Book of Concord (Lutheran), and the 39 Articles (Anglican), and the 1689 Baptist Confession of Faith.

Fourth, the doctrines of particular theologians are of importance but mainly to spur discussion on theological issues, even church and ethical matters.  One might study Calvin on the sacraments, Luther on marriage, or Wesley on preaching and find much to commend to faithful believers.  Yet, their specific opinions on matters doctrinal and theological are not to cage believers in theological wrestling matches that end up being more about opinions and less about Scripture.


This model is beautiful in that it captures the top-down hierarchy of Scripture – Creed – Confession – theologians in a succinct and clear manner.  Crisp writes, “For the Church catholic, dogmatic authority is top-down affair, generated by Scripture…It is not something generated from the bottom-up, that is, from the opinions of private individuals (18).”  We feel the urge to start with the most popular or provocative display of writing, whether it be a preacher of professor and tag along for the ride in their discovery of theology.  Yet, for all our strivings, we often find no new model of theology but a rehashing and reshaping of the old beliefs of the past.  This model at least gives us pause to think Scripturally first, and then gauge the rest of our studies upon this firm ladder which rests firmly on the ground.  

Two books that engage these matters are:
Oliver Crisp, God Incarnate: Explorations in Theology, Edinburgh, U.K.: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2009.
John Webster, Holy Scripture: A Dogmatic Sketch (Current Issues in Theology), Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

the great spiritual migration

The Great Spiritual Migration by Brian D McLaren

Brian McLaren and his own pithy way brings to the foreground and emphasis on a new kind of Christianity. The kind of faith that Brian envisions is a kind of migration not been set in the bedrock of beliefs that is unmoving but rather shifting with both culture and with faith. His new book the great spiritual migration is exactly that, a pointed work that encapsulates a vision towards the future where Christianity is changing and its peoples lives are changed as well.

Brian states in the introduction, "but we also know that for a lot of people Christianity is malfunctioning, seriously so, and it's not pretty. This kind of frustration with conventional Christianity is what McLaren gets gets to at the heart of this message is concerned with a number of different clusters unbelief. One, namely that Christianity has been stuck in a set of propositions or beliefs that has controlled churches in the faith, rather then a spirit of love t…

Black Earth: The Holocaust as History and Warning

Black Earth: The Holocaust as History and Warning by Timothy Snyder
Misperceptions, misconnections, and missed observations are just some of the issues that Timothy Snyder raises in his book, Black Earth, concerning the Holocaust.  Snyder, no stranger to the frontlines of scholarship on the Holocaust, with his previous book Bloodlands, that concerns the land from Hitler to Stalin, takes a look at the Holocaust from new sources and new avenues of thought.  How did some nation-states survive relatively unscathed from Nazi persecution while others, notably Jewish populations, succumb to a wave of killings?  Also, what was the role of the Soviet Union in the war and how did Stalin effect changes in the Final Solution?  These questions are only two of the many that Snyder answers in his detailed account of the Holocaust.
One of the best chapters was entitled The Auschwitz Paradox.  Generally when the public thinks about the Holocaust, we think of Auschwitz first or at the top of our mental m…

NKJV Study Bible by Thomas Nelson

NKJV Study Bible by Thomas Nelson Publishers
Growing up with the NIV, the NKJV was not a bible I was familiar with.  This new NKJV Study Bible takes all of the features of the Thomas Nelson Study Bible and makes them better.  Right out of the box I noticed that the Bible was considerably lighter than most study bibles I have read.  Further, the text font was much larger than most study editions, although I’m not quite sure of the size. The aquamarine color was a great touch and the Bible was finely put together, enduring the wear of many coming years of use.
Why is this Bible worth the purchase?  First, the study notes were great for extra handling of particular confusing and messy areas of Scriptures, both Old and New Testaments.  Yet, the study notes aren’t an obstruction to the reading of the biblical text.  Clearly, the editors have taken great care in making the text stand out and the notes illuminate certain themes and areas of Scripture.  Second, the NKJV takes into account all t…